There’s a conversation I have almost every time I start working with a new clean energy client. I ask them to explain what it is they’re selling, what problem it solves, and for who it’s meant to help — not the technical answer, the market answer.

And almost without exception, I get the technology answer.

I hear about how their specific clean tech works…all of the pieces included in it and how they work together. The outputs, like thermal gradient thresholds, round-trip efficiency curves, capacity factor improvements. All of it accurate. None of it useful for a buyer who is still deciding whether that category of solution belongs in their procurement conversation at all.

This isn’t a criticism. It’s a structural problem — one that’s baked into how most clean energy companies are built: from a view in which their innovative founders approach the core problem. Meanwhile, buyers are looking at solutions from another angle—you just have to figure out how to bridge that value gap.

The Founder-Market Fit Problem

Most growth-stage clean energy companies are founded by people who understand the technology at a depth their buyers never will. That’s the point. That expertise is the competitive advantage.

But it creates a communication mismatch that shows up everywhere: on the website, in pitch decks, in sales conversations, in press releases, in RFP responses. The language that comes naturally to a technical founder — or to the engineers who became the first marketers — is the language of how, not why.

Buyers don’t buy how. They buy why.

A utility procurement manager doesn’t need to understand your BESS chemistry to write you into a grid stabilization contract. They need to understand that your system solves a specific reliability problem, that it integrates with infrastructure they already have, and that the risk profile is acceptable. The technology is table stakes. The story is what gets you the meeting.

Three Ways the Messaging Gap Manifests

1. The feature-first homepage

If the first thing a visitor reads on your website is a specification — capacity range, response time, round-trip efficiency — you’ve already lost most of your audience. Buyers who aren’t already familiar with your product category won’t know what to do with those numbers. And buyers who are familiar know they can find comparable specs from five of your competitors.

Features tell buyers what. Value tells them so what. The homepage’s job is the ‘so what.’

2. The proof gap

Growth-stage clean energy companies are often selling before they have a deep library of customer success stories. So when buyers ask for case studies, the answer is thin — and instead of addressing that directly, most companies default to leading with specs and technical validation.

That’s the wrong trade. Buyers aren’t looking for perfection; they’re looking for evidence that someone like them made this work. A single well-told customer story — even from a pilot, even from a partial deployment — does more commercial work than a full technical white paper. If you don’t have the proof yet, your marketing strategy needs to account for that explicitly, not paper over it with data sheets.

3. The audience mismatch

Clean energy companies often market to the audience they find most comfortable: other technical people. Engineers. Researchers. Conference attendees who already believe in the technology and speak the language fluently.

But the people who actually sign contracts are rarely that audience. They’re CFOs evaluating capital deployment risk. Operations directors looking at integration complexity. Sustainability heads trying to hit a 2030 target without blowing their budget. They care deeply about outcomes and very little about mechanisms.

And it compounds: most clean energy purchase decisions involve at least two distinct stakeholders who need completely different things: the technical reviewer and the check writers. The engineer vetting your BESS system wants integration specs and performance guarantees. The CFO signing off wants payback period, risk exposure, and downside scenarios. Most companies write all their marketing for the technical evaluator because that’s who they’re comfortable with, and leave the decision-maker without a clear reason to say yes. A buying committee where only half the room is convinced is a stalled deal.

What Fixing It Actually Looks Like

I want to be clear: this is not a problem you solve with a better tagline.

Messaging work in clean energy is substantive strategic work. It requires talking to actual buyers — not just existing customers who already understand you, but prospects who chose a competitor or chose to do nothing. It requires understanding the decision process: who initiates it, who influences it, who vetoes it, and what each of those people needs to hear.

It requires distinguishing between your technology story (what you’ve built and how it works) and your market story (who has a problem you solve, and why your solution is the right one at this moment in time).

Those are two different documents. Most clean energy companies only have the first one.

Once you have the market story, the rest of your marketing gets dramatically easier. Your website speaks to buyers. Your sales team has a clear narrative thread to follow. Your content builds a case that compounds over time. Your RFP responses tell a story instead of just checking boxes.

A Useful Test

Here’s a simple diagnostic: give your homepage to someone who works in your buyers’ world but doesn’t know your company. Give them 30 seconds. Then ask them two questions:

  1. What problem does this company solve?
  2. Who should be calling them?

If they can’t answer both questions confidently, you have a messaging problem — and that problem is costing you pipeline whether you can see it or not.

The Bottom Line

Clean energy companies don’t struggle to explain what they do because the technology is too complex. They struggle because no one has done the work to translate technical depth into buyer relevance.

That translation is marketing’s job. And done well, it’s one of the highest-ROI investments a growth-stage clean energy company can make.

Kerri Ryan is a fractional CMO and independent marketing consultant with 25+ years of B2B marketing experience and 15+ years in the energy sector. She works with growth-stage clean energy companies across BESS, next-generation geothermal, solar, industrial decarbonization, green hydrogen, and clean tech solutions. Learn more at kryanoutloud.com.

— END —

Want these insights in your inbox?

Once-a-month clean energy marketing analysis. No fluff.